« Pro-divorce study "a reassuring academic loogie in the face of self-sacrifice"? Um...no, actually. | Main | In defense of bohemia »

Spring cleaning has turned into summer cleaning by now

I have a goal with my spring cleaning. I want to evoke a mood in my house. A mood other than "gaping pit."

Not, I hasten to add, that there is anything wrong with "gaping pit." As a design statement, I think it's been drastically underrated. It is the perfect choice for anyone wanting to convey a feeling of "Fuck you," "Fuck me," "Fuck it," "Fuck the world," "Fucking STOP INTERRUPTING ME," or "Fuck...we're all gonna die anyway." These are important concepts which are sadly under-represented in today's interior design landscape. The "gaping pit" aesthetic is uniquely suited to evoking each and every one of them and should not be overlooked.

However, after twenty years, I feel I have explored the possibilities of this style pretty thoroughly and would like to try another one.

This left me with the task of deciding which one it should be.

After months and months of faithfully reading the luscious "House Beautiful," I know one thing for sure. I cannot in any way aim for the kind of sumptuous traditional interior which they display in all of its many flavors. (These include: grand, tweedy, sun-baked, moss-covered, WASP-y, boho, decadent, bleached, color-splashed, rococo--well, really, it's all rococo--and the ever-serviceable country-club. There may be others. But those are the ones I've noticed so far.)

And why?

Because these interiors, though perfectly arranged, are busy. A lot of them, I hate to say, are even fussy. In my opinion.

And that reads to me like clutter. Very pretty clutter, but clutter.

And I am trying to recover from clutter.

So I need to go in the opposite direction.

Now, there aren't too many "opposite directions" from traditional. Most other recognized styles--country, Mediterranean, Shabby Chic, contemporary/MOR, arts-and-crafts--are pretty crowded. Even Southwestern.

Modernism is contrastingly pristine, but it's too hard. Its feel, its look, its lines are all so absolute. I am a soft, wiggly organic being.

So, I am going to aim for Zen. Natural textures and gentle shapes, but simple, simple, simple. Empty, in a good way. I'm going for that.

We'll see.

Comments (2)

Ulla Lauridsen:

We'll see?
Is that a promise?
My own style is gaping pit with lots of shit, so I find your enterprise exciting.
Could you please post some pictures. 'Before'-pictures can't be had now, I guess, but do show us some 'after' ones, please.

Savannah:

Hi, Ulla!

Thanks for your interest in my long-drawn-out project.

I think "We'll see" is more of a vague hope than anything else...but if I can (a) find a digital camera and (b) get my husband to help me with the technical end, I will post a few pictures of what we've done so far. It probably won't be soon, but I will try.

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on June 14, 2009 10:28 AM.

The previous post in this blog was Pro-divorce study "a reassuring academic loogie in the face of self-sacrifice"? Um...no, actually..

The next post in this blog is In defense of bohemia.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
Powered by
Movable Type 3.33